Sunday, June 28, 2020

Book vs. Movie Harry Potter and the Sorcerers Stone - Free Essay Example

There are many differences when most literary works become movies. Usually because the director wants to cut parts out because he does not feel they are important enough to make the final cut. That is usually true for all works that are made into movies. The book will go more into depth about people, things, and places because they have more chapters, characters, and views on certain things than the movies will go into. When J. K. Rowling wrote Harry Potter and the Sorcerers stone and was published in 1997, it became a huge success around the world. The movie was created five years later in 2002. There were differences throughout the two of them as they usually are between literary works and movies. First, one of the big differences are how characters are portrayed and how they appear, such as looks and appearances. Harry Potter in the book is explained as smaller for his age, has a scar, obviously, crazy messy hair, and green hazel eyes. In the movie he does not have the crazy hair, is normal height for his age compared to the others and has blue eyes. Other ones include Ron, Harry Potter best friend, not having a long nose. Where in the book he is described as having a long nose and a little dorky, with red hair and freckles. Also, the Uncle and Aunt, who took Harry Potter in after his parents died, are described as blonde in the book. Details such as these are left out in Hollywood because usually, they do not care about the little details, but they are found by the ones who have read the book. Secondly, some little details in the book versus the movie are how harry potter sees his parents in the mirror when he is snooping around Hogwarts. In the book he sees his whole extended family that has passed on. Another is in the book when they Harry, Ron, And Hermione are going through their tasks to get to the Scorers stone. The movie left out the potion task, in the book Hermione completes a potion task to get through to the next stage. In the movie, she just stays behind to show aid to Ron after they win in the chess game. This just shows how different and certain things will be cut out of a movie. Sometimes they can not see every detail but everyone who has read the book sees it. Sometimes the director cuts out parts that you really liked in the book out of the movie. Showing differences between movies and their books.

Monday, June 1, 2020

Leader Who Liberated The Indian Sub-Continent - Free Essay Example

History bears witness to the rise and fall of kingdoms, dynasties and revolutions over the years and there is one key element that is found to be common in every era. That is the presence of a leader who united the people under one cause. The type and quality of leadership is pivotal to the survival and success of a group. Effective leadership with proper structure and organization can lead the masses to victory and fulfilment. In this paper, I chose to talk about a leader who liberated the Indian sub-continent from the colonial rule spanning nearly two centuries. Â  A land known for its rich culture, heritage and diversity, India was called the golden bird because of its abundant raw materials, precious stones, gold and other riches. Foreigners saw it as the perfect quest for wealth and prosperity. Invaders from all over the world have been documented to embark on a journey to India, either to loot and plunder or to establish some sort of permanence on the Indian soil. The Arabs, the Mongols, the Persians, in addition to their European counterparts from France, Portugal, Denmark and the Netherlands, all invaded India at some point. However, the one that lasted till modern times was the British Raj which started as the East India Company, initially a trade establishment that later went on to exert control, dominance and ultimately, colonization. The general population of India suffered large scale exploitation at the hands of the imperial rule. Apart from discrimination in the political and economic scenario, Indians were treated as second-class citizens in their own motherland. A once rich and affluent country was slowly losing its wealth and grandeur to the foreign entity. This brought about feelings of deep resentment and created the need for sovereignty. They say when human hardships are at its peak, a messiah emerges to empower people and lead them to victory. In my opinion, India needed her fair share of extraordinary men and women who could bring back her lost freedom and among those brave people was a man so rare and remarkable that an entire sub-continent still reveres him as the father of the nation. As an Indian, I understand that we paid a tremendous price for freedom and Mahatma Gandhi will always be at the apex of our identity as proud nationals of a free country.